Statistical Misuse

Statistics No Comments »

One of my favorite columns in The Wall Street Journal is “Ahead of the Tape”, which is typically in the left column of page C1 of the print edition. Unfortunately, Mr. Whitehouse made a rather silly mistake today. Consider the following passage:

Yet from a statistician’s point of view, the market’s reaction to the [Labor Department's monthly jobs report] is hard to fathom. Over the past six years, the economists’ consensus has missed the reported number, on average, by about 82,000 jobs, according to Bianco Research. That might look like a big difference. But as a percentage of total payroll employment — 135 million — it’s actually very small, less than one tenth of 1%.

Measuring the employment change forecast miss as a percentage of total employed isn’t appropriate. The reason why is that the total payroll employment figure changes relatively little from month to month — a smashing increase of 400,000 jobs in a month is only a 0.3% change.

To illustrate, let’s say the average temperature of the core of the sun is 15,000,000 K and the standard deviation of temperature is 1,000 K. This means that 99.6% of the time the temperature will be between 14,997,000 K and 15,003,000 K. If your forecast is off by 0.1% of the average temperature (15,000 K) it is absurd!

A better method to estimate prediction accuracy is to compare prediction error (probably the root mean squared error) to the standard deviation of the distribution. No doubt that there are better methods yet.

WP Theme & Icons by N.Design Studio
Entries RSS Comments RSS Log in